Description Unit 5 Assignment 1 – Purchase Proposal Submit Assignment Due Sun …

Description Unit 5 Assignment 1 – Purchase Proposal Submit Assignment Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 50 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Estimated time to complete: 2 hours Instructions You are the practice manager for Dermatology Associates of Linwood (DAL): a multi-physician dermatology practice. Recently, the physician partners have decided to invest in purchasing an existing dermatology practice in a neighboring city, which will be operated under the group’s name. They have asked you to research the financial logistics of acquiring this new location. The practice is fully-staffed, however the (one) physician owner is retiring, leaving an opening for a new physician to be hired. In keeping with DAL’s standard of care, several new expenses will be incurred with the acquisition, including: access to DAL’s electronic medical record system, a Fraxel laser, and new furniture for the waiting room area. Draft a proposal, addressing the following items in a Word document: Summary of estimated primary startup costs (create a table to illustrate and organize this information) Financing options Summary of when the practice will reach profitability. Explain the finance principle you can use to make this determination. (You do not need to perform the calculations, but you do need to explain how to estimate and assess profitability). Include a minimum of three references, APA style, on a separate page. Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria. Submit: Purchase Proposal Rubric HC306 Unit 5 Assignment 1 – Purchase Proposal HC306 Unit 5 Assignment 1 – Purchase Proposal Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 15.0 pts 5 Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors. 14.0 pts 4 Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed. 12.0 pts 3 Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial. 11.0 pts 2 Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors. 9.0 pts 1 Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement. 0.0 pts 0 There is no evidence of a defined statement. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P 25.0 pts 5 Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 23.0 pts 4 Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 20.0 pts 3 Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 18.0 pts 2 Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities. 15.0 pts 1 Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus. 0.0 pts 0 Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting 5.0 pts 5 The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. 4.5 pts 4 The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication. 4.0 pts 3 The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication. 3.5 pts 2 The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication. 3.0 pts 1 The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning. 0.0 pts 0 The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I 5.0 pts 5 The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references. 4.5 pts 4 The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 4.0 pts 3 The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 3.5 pts 2 The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 3.0 pts 1 Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references. 0.0 pts 0 There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references. 5.0 pts Total Points: 50.0 PreviousNext