I want you to identify the paper that was the best one of the semesters, and
the paper that was the worst one of all these papers below. You should name
each of them, and provide just a couple of sentences describing why you
choose them. Then use the scholarly search tools we listed early in the
semester to find current papers (2020 onward) on the same two general
topics. For example, if one of your choices is the paper that focused on
Multics virtual memory, you probably wouldn’t find much that is current and
specifically references Multics, but you could certainly find papers on some
aspect of virtual memory. So again, find a current paper on each of those two
topics. Then write the usual summary and reaction for each of them with the
headings. (Note: don’t forget which papers you chose for best and worst.)
Paper 1: Read this paper: Peter Chen, Edward Lee, Garth Gibson, Randy Katz,
and David Patterson, "RAID: High-Performance, Reliable Secondary Storage",
ACM Computing Surveys, volume 26, number 2, June 1994.
Paper 2: Mendel Rosenblum and John Ousterhout, "The Design and
Implementation of a Log Structured File System", Proceedings of the
Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, 1991.
Paper 3: John Howard, Michael Kazarm Sherri Menees, David Nichols, M.
Satyanarayanan, Robert Sidebotham, and Michael West, "Scale and
Performance in a Distributed File System", ACM Transactions on Computer
Systems, Volume 6, Number 1, February 1988.
Paper 4: The paper is A. Bensoussan and R. Daley, "The Multics Virtual Memory:
Concepts and Design", Proceedings of the Symposium on Operating Systems
Paper 5: Peter Denning, "The Working Set Model for Program Behavior",
Communications of the ACM, 1968.
Paper 6: Richard Carr and John Hennessy, "WSClock — A Simple and Effective
Algorithm for Virtual Memory Management", Proceedings of the Symposium on
Operating Systems Principles, 1981.
Paper 7: Judy Kay and Piers Lauder, A fair share scheduler, Communications of
the ACM 31.1, 1988
Paper 8: Carl Waldspurger and Weihl William, Lottery scheduling: Flexible
proportional-share resource management, In Proceedings of the 1st USENIX
conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, 1994
Paper 9: Dabek, Frank, et al. "Event-driven programming for robust software."
Proceedings of the 10th workshop on ACM SIGOPS European workshop. 2002.
Paper 10: Rob von Behren, Jeremy Condit, and Eric Brewer, Why Events Are A
Bad Idea (for high-concurrency servers), Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more