The Organization ofthe PoliceImagine that you are a member ofCongress. One of your staff assistants brings you a proposal to nationalize lawenforcement throughout the United States. The proposal calls for abolishingstate police agencies, county sheriffs, and local police departments. Instead,Congress would create a new U.S. Department of Law Enforcement. A Secretary ofLaw Enforcement would oversee a national police agency which would have unitsestablished in each, state, county, city, and town. Your assistant argues thatthe new organization would save resources by coordinating the work of every lawenforcement officer in the nation and creating a standard set of lawenforcement policies and priorities. In addition, the plan would standardize training,salary, and benefits for police officers everywhere. Thus, raising the level ofprofessionalism of the police, especially in small towns and rural areas.Before you decide whether or not to present this proposal to Congress, addressthe following below:Identify and explain any undesirable consequences thatcould develop from putting this plan into action. Discuss how this willimpact the plan. Identify and describe the positive aspects of this planfor law enforcement. Discuss how it could impact the future of lawenforcement.As a politician, you are concerned with how others willreact to the plan. Predict how each group below would react and explainwhy.Voters State and local politicians, including electedsheriffs and prosecutors Police officers Police managers/chiefs Are you in support of this proposal? Explain why or whynot? Your papermust be three to four pages in length (exclusive of title and reference pages)and formatted according to APA style. Support your claims and subclaims withmaterial from the text, Police Administration, as well as two academicresources from the Ashford Online Library. For information regarding APAsamples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the LearningResources tab on the left navigation toolbar. our first written assignment is one that will requirean in depth analysis of our current situation and where we could end up as anation. The first written assignmentstatesthat you should discuss the pros and cons of a national law enforcement agencyand how this impacts the future of policing, our nation and even smallcommunities. As you work on this assignment, one of the first areas you need tothink of is the fact that the military will never police us as a nation. Withthat said, is a national law enforcement agency something like the military? Asa positive, the national law enforcement agency could help small departmentsthat are behind on training and equipment. This would then in turn allow forbetter services for citizens, however policing and its needs are differentthroughout the nation.Required TextGaines, L., & Worrall, J.(2012). Police administration (3rd ed.). United States: Delmar CengageLearningDescription: Total Possible Score: 10.00Identifiesand Explains Undesirable Consequences That Could Develop From Putting the Planinto Action Total: 1.50Distinguished – Clearly identifiesand comprehensively explains undesirable consequences that could develop fromputting the plan into action. Thoroughly discusses how the negativeconsequences will impact the plan.Proficient – Identifies and explainsundesirable consequences that could develop from putting the plan into action.Discusses how the negative consequences will impact the plan. Minor details aremissing.Basic – Identifies and brieflyexplains some undesirable consequences that could develop from putting the planinto action. Provides a limited discussion of how the negative consequenceswill impact the plan. Relevant details are missing.Below Expectations – Identifies andattempts to explain the undesirable consequences that could develop fromputting the plan into action; however, the discussion of the negativeconsequences and their impacts is not clear and the explanation is missingsignificant details.Non-Performance – The identificationand explanation of undesirable consequences are either nonexistent or lack thecomponents described in the assignment instructions.Identifiesand Describes the Positive Aspects of the Plan for Law EnforcementTotal: 1.50Distinguished – Clearly identifiesand thoroughly describes the positive aspects of the plan. Comprehensivelydiscusses how it could impact the future of law enforcement. The description issupported with specific and relevant examples.Proficient – Identifies anddescribes the positive aspects of the plan. Discusses how it could impact thefuture of law enforcement. The description is supported with examples.Basic – Identifies and brieflydescribes some positive aspects of the plan. Provides a limited discussion ofhow it could impact the future of law enforcement. The description is somewhatsupported with examples.Below Expectations – Identifies andattempts to describe the positive aspects of the plan and discuss how it couldimpact the future of law enforcement; however, the description is unclear,underdeveloped and/or is unsupported by examples.Non-Performance – The identificationand description of the positive aspects of the plan are either nonexistent orlack the components described in the assignment instructions.Predictsand Explains Group ReactionsTotal: 2.50Distinguished – Provides acomprehensive prediction and thorough explanation of each groups’ reactions.The prediction and explanation are clear, detailed, and address all groupslisted.Proficient – Provides a predictionand explanation of each groups’ reactions. The prediction and explanationaddress all groups listed.Basic – Provides a limitedprediction and a minimal explanation of each groups’ reactions. The predictionand explanation address all groups listed, but they are somewhat unclear orcontain inaccuracies.Below Expectations – Attempts topredict and explain group reactions; however, the prediction and explanation donot address all groups listed and/or are vague or inaccurate.Non-Performance – The prediction andexplanation of each groups’ reactions are either nonexistent or lack thecomponents described in the assignment instructions.ExplainsPersonal PositionTotal: 2.50Distinguished – Thoroughly explainspersonal position. Supports position with research and reference to impacts andgroup reactions.Proficient – Explains personalposition, with support and reference to impacts and group reactions. Theexplanation is slightly unclear.Basic – Explains personal position,but the explanation lacks clarity and offers only minimal support and briefreference to impacts and group reactions.Below Expectations – Explainspersonal position, but it is unclear and without support or reference toimpacts and group reactions.Non-Performance – The explanation ofa personal position is either nonexistent or lacks the components described inthe assignment instructions.Reading:Relationship to TextTotal: 0.33Distinguished – Analyzes texts forscholarly significance and pertinence within and across the variousdisciplines, assessing them according to their contributions and consequences.Proficient – Utilizes texts in thecontext of scholarship to expand a foundation of disciplinary knowledge and toraise and discover significant inquiries.Basic – Employs texts with theintent and expectation of increasing knowledge.Below Expectations – Approachestexts only within the context of assignment.Non-Performance – The assignment iseither nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.CriticalThinking: EvidenceTotal: 0.34Distinguished – Employs persuasiveinformation from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis ofthe topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.Proficient – Employs applicableinformation from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic.Basic – Identifies applicableinformation from credible sources, but may neglect the application of suchinformation toward the analysis of the topic.Below Expectations – Displaysinformation from external sources, but such information may lack credibilityand/or relevance. Neglects the application of such information toward theanalysis of the topic.Non-Performance – The assignment iseither nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.WrittenCommunication: Context of and Purpose for WritingTotal: 0.33Distinguished – Demonstratesmethodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purposeof the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/orparaphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flowssmoothly.Proficient – Demonstrates sufficientapplication of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of thewriting is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are someproblems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flowssomewhat smoothly.Basic – Demonstrates a limitedunderstanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. Thepurpose of the writing is somewhat evident, but may not be integratedthroughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending ofsummaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.Below Expectations – Organizationand presentation of content is extremely limited. The purpose of the writing isunclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes.Paper does not flow smoothly when read.Non-Performance – The assignment iseither nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.WrittenCommunication: Control of Syntax and MechanicsTotal: 0.25Distinguished – Displays meticulouscomprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling andgrammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.Proficient – Displays comprehensionand organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Writtenwork contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.Basic – Displays basic comprehensionof syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains afew errors, which may slightly distract the reader.Below Expectations – Fails todisplay basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling andgrammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.Non-Performance – The assignment iseither nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.APAFormattingTotal: 0.25Distinguished – Accurately uses APAformatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.Proficient – Exhibits APA formattingthroughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge ofAPA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APArequirements.Below Expectations – Fails toexhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, makingthe layout difficult to distinguish as APA.Non-Performance – The assignment iseither nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.PageRequirementTotal: 0.25Distinguished – The paper meets thespecific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.Proficient – The paper closely meetsthe page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.Basic – The paper meets over half ofthe page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.Below Expectations – A fraction ofthe page requirement is completed.Non-Performance – The assignment iseither nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.ResourceRequirementTotal: 0.25Distinguished – Uses more than therequired number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to supportideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly withinthe body of the assignment.Proficient – Uses required number ofscholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are usedand cited correctly within the body of the assignment.Basic – Uses less than the requirednumber of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Mostsources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment.Citations may not be formatted correctly.Below Expectations – Uses inadequatenumber of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used maynot be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within thebody of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.Non-Performance – The assignment iseither nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.